A powerful and quite unique piece of writing.
Kate McCann finishes charity bike ride with 'Madeleine on her mind'
Ponderings of a Hobnob
Thursday, June 18, 2015
. . . . . Then the last marble makes its appearance, we have the classic comment that reveals you for the desperate liars you are:"there is no evidence to the contrary,'' Except, there is, no matter how much you deny and spin.it
There is the evidence of blood and body fluids in the apartment and hire car.
There are the reactions of the blood and cadaver dogs Eddie and Keela behind the sofa, in your wardrobe, the child's red t-shirt, your black and white checked pants oh, and not forgetting, Cuddle Cat.
If, as you say, there is not evidence to the contrary, why then did you, your family and friends and, even dear, dear clarrie come up with explanations for what was found.
Dirty diapers, sweaty sandals, rotting meat and fish, garbage. Maddie falling over in the apartment hurting herself (you can thank gerry for that contribution) though it would not be your fault.
"And if Madeleine had hurt herself inside the apartment – why would that be our fault"? Nose bleeds, even the laughable coming into contact with multiple dead patients before your vacation hence the contamination.
What there is no evidence of, even after eight years and investigation by both the PJ and SY, is abduction.
Not one fingerprint, palm print, foot print even ear print.
Not one fibre
Not one hair
Not one skin cell, drop of sweat, tears or semen by a stranger.
No reliable eyewitness.
No one hearing the sound of a shutter being raised or lowered on a quiet night standing feet away from the apartment.
No one hearing the sound of someone walking away quickly in a silent street.Nothing, zilch, nada!
Nothing that shows a stranger got into the apartment and abducted Maddie.
Remember it is not only what is there that shouldn't be.
It is also what isn't there that should be.
I do wonder though how your coming into contact with multiple dead bodies would result in cadaverine on a child's red t-shirt and cuddlecat.
Contact transfer wouldn't work since all items that came into contact with your clothes would have been tainted.
Claiming that perhaps you took Cuddle Cat to work with you is just plain unbelievable.
If it was Maddie's favorite toy, her comforter, why would you deprive her of it and take it to work?
How could you have taken it to work prior to the vacation if it was an early birthday present from a relative?
Why would someone claim it was an early birthday present when perhaps she had had it for some time and was her favorite comforter?
Did he not remember his script? . . . . more