Saturday, September 08, 2012

Anna Ardin Witness For The Prosecution

Leaving all that surrounds the case of Julian Assange out of things, and all other factors apart, can I but ask this one question?

In a judicial system that was just and open to public scrutiny, what prosecutor in the world would even think about trying bring a prosecution where the main witness and accuser had written a brief dissertation on the subject, of all things, Revenge.

I think you might join me in saying, not one. Because let's face it, the existence of such a document is; what can I liken it to? A torpedo, yes a torpedo, a torpedo for the defence, a torpedo, armed, primed and fuse and course set.

A torpedo, whose very existence would mean only one thing, the sinking of the prosecutions case the minute the witness took the stand. I have this vision if you will, of a periscope, a back to front cap and the cry of 'Los!'

As I say, this scenario would only play out in a judicial system that was just and open to public scrutiny. But could this be said of Sweden, where any trial of Julian Assange would be subject to the following conditions.

.If there is a charge and a trial, it will be held in secret.

.He will not be judged by an ’independent and impartial tribunal’, a fundamental requirement under the European Convention of Human Rights (article 6.1). Three out of the four judges are lay judges, who have been appointed by political parties and have no formal legal training. Fair Trial for Julian Assange?


I don't make mention of pre-trial conditions, they can be accessed at the link above, but for me, the words secret and trial, or justice for that matter, don't belong in the same sentence.

That which is posted below, contains, apart from Anna Ardin's seven salient pieces of advice on the subject of revenge, the bare minimum of the original post. And for no other reason that I don't care much for the writers style, nor what he has to say for that matter. But then, that's not the essence of the post, it's what is going on inside Ardin's head that is germane.



Anna Ardin's new revenge school!

Learn how to get revenge on a really creative way. Courses for all the girls who are not content with throwing vases or having uninhibited sex with his intended victim's friends and acquaintances.

Here we learn that in a subtle way, to destroy the victim's life. Anna was previously on his blog going through the first steps of a creatively cruel revenge. Here is the continuation course for all the girls who see PMS as a natural condition of life.

Terror Feminist prosecutor Marianne Ny will jump in as our expert in extreme retaliation cases that require a little extra terror feminism.


Repeat revenge with Anna!

For all students who forgot Anna's former vengeance lessons are now able to refresh your memory a bit. Here is Anna through everything required for that suffering will be a maximum painfully of his intended victim.

Stage 1
Consider very carefully if you really must take revenge. It's almost always better to forgive than to avenge

Stage 2
Think about why you want revenge. You do not need to just be clear about who to take revenge on, but also why. Revenge is never directed against only one person, but also meet a certain action.

Step 3
The principle of proportionality. Remember that revenge will not only match the deed in size but also in nature. A good revenge is linked to what has been done against you. For example if you want revenge on someone who cheated or who dumped you, so the penalty should have something with dating / sex / fidelity to do.

Step 4
Make a brainstorm about appropriate measures for the category of revenge you're after. To continue the example above, you can paja your victim's current relationship, fix so that his new partner is unfaithful or ensure that he gets a madman after him. Use your imagination!

Step 5
Think of how you can systematically take revenge. Perhaps a series of letters and photos, the new to believe that you have seen more than just a big lie on a single occasion?

Step 6
Rank your systematic revenge schemes from low to high in terms of likely successful implementation, the required input from you, and degree of satisfaction if you succeed. The ideal, of course, revenge is as high as possible in these columns, but can often be an increased effort by labor and capital provide safer output for the other two, really important parameters.

Step 7
Screed to work. And remember what your goals are while you are operating, ensure that your victim will suffer in the same way as he made ​​you suffer. Under Mattan, translated.




53 comments:

  1. Naomi Wolf on BBC Newsnight discusses her stance on the Julian Assange rape case as well as her overall opinion on rape and how it's treated in the judicial system. For once Jeremy Paxman remains silent as she ventures into the seemingly uncomfortable topic of vagina/brain connection.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?
    v=OQngyrfNjIA

    ReplyDelete
  2. http://rixstep.com/1/20110204,02
    .shtml

    Anna says that she thought she actually didn't want to go any further but it was too late to say 'stop' to Assange when she'd 'gone along with it this far'. She thought she 'could blame herself'. So she let Assange fully undress her.

    Anna Ardin, political analyst!, not to mention feminist.

    ReplyDelete
  3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?
    v=OQngyrfNjIA

    Thanks, but I don't know what to make of it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anna Ardin, political analyst!, not to mention feminist.

    Quite.

    Julian Assange, whistlebower, not to mention, no finesse.

    But if reports are to be believed, Ardin didn't go to the cops to report a rape, but to see if Assange could be forced to take an STD test.

    If reports are to be believed.

    I think the only thing you can believe with certainty, is the political motivation that lies at the heart of the whole sordid affair.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Why I am Convinced that Anna Ardin is a Liar

    http://bit.ly/PeBB20

    ReplyDelete
  6. Similar criticisms of the Swedish legal system are based largely on myths and misconceptions. The framework of Sweden’s criminal law with respect to sexual offenses is no different from most other countries’. I will not be sentenced for rape if my condom breaks during a sexual act. But, like in many other countries, I can be convicted of rape if I have sex with a sleeping or unconscious person.

    http://bit.ly/Mn886C
    -----------------------------------

    This statement was written by Irmeli Krans, a Swedish police officer, on 20 August 2010 and amended on 26 August 2010. It purports to be the record of an interview with Sofia Wilen, but Sofia Wilen refused to sign the statement and has not done so to this day.

    http://bit.ly/Qcr38Z

    ReplyDelete
  7. Guten tag liebling.

    http://bit.ly/Mn886C

    Sounds like a bastion of flair play doesn't it?

    But how easily he dismisses Assange's real fear.

    Finally, no, the Swedish police will not place Assange on a CIA-chartered plane as soon as he arrives at Stockholm airport. They, like all other Swedish authorities, will discharge their duties according to the law.

    They, like all other Swedish authorities, will discharge their duties according to the law.

    Which includes no doubt, honouring an extradition request from the US.

    Mårten Schultz is Professor of Law, Stockholm University.

    Yes quite.

    http://bit.ly/Qcr38Z

    I didn't bother reading the statement again, it's what yer man has to say that's more telling.

    Rather than take her to a medical facility, Ardin took Wilen to a police station, under the pretext that the police might be able to compel Assange to take an STD test – which even in Sweden must be an extraordinary proposition.

    Ardin did not take Wilen to the nearest police station. She took her right across Stockholm to the police station where Ardin’s friend, lesbian feminist campaigner Irmeli Krans, was serving. They arrived at 2pm and rather than see another officer, they waited two hours until Krans came on duty. Then Ardin was present throughtout Krans’ interview of Wilen – which appears to have very much informed Ardin’s presentation of her own subsequent allegation against Assange. Ardin’s “assault” by Assange took place several days before the Wilen “assault”, but was not reported by Ardin until two days after she had sat through Wilen’s interview with her friend Krans.



    bit.ly/hbPYDW

    Interesting but it's all conjecture, and I can't find a name for who wrote it, not a good sign.

    I did notice the Miami Herald being quoted, for what little I have seen of their reporting, they don't seem very impressed with the whole affair, be it the 'wimin' Sweden or the US.

    And then there is this, which makes me quite wary about all the rest of it. Even for Sweden it takes some believing.

    The Swedish laws define rape broadly, so that pressing an erect penis against a woman's back the morning after consensual sex

    By that metric then, every man that has ever spent the night with a woman is guilty of rape.

    What so you, liberal Hollander?







    ReplyDelete
  8. Have I got the women the wrong way round, I thought Enid Coleslaw was Ardin?

    Picture at the last link.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Guten Abend besten Blogger,

    They, like all other Swedish authorities, will discharge their duties according to the law. - Mårten Schultz, Professor of Law, Stockholm University.

    How diplomatic.

    sex with a sleeping or unconscious person

    Zo ongezellig!

    Ich wünsche dir eine entspannte Nacht und alles Liebe. xxx

    ReplyDelete
  10. Mary Charlene‏
    @IamEnidColeslaw

    I am Enid Coleslaw. You are Enid Coleslaw. We are all Enid Coleslaw EXCEPT YOU MITT ROMNEY

    ReplyDelete
  11. Morning Chuck.

    She's a love isn't she? A twenty seven year old pubescent.

    ReplyDelete
  12. http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2012/09/why-i-am-convinced-that-anna-ardin-is-a-liar/comment-page-3/#comments

    comment Kathy Da Silva
    18 Sep, 2012 - 1:35 pm

    I am very thankful for the above article which should be read by everyone concerned to know the truth of what happened. I think what you have written explains the time line of events very well. Maybe in future, Julian will have to consider staying with known friends. Neither women seem to care about the future of WikiLeaks because they only care about themselves. But, globally we’re all benefiting. I feel a cloud of oppression got lifted off my head, when listening to all the interviews with Julian Assange explaining WikiLeaks work. It’s a shame that neither of the girls could think of the wider outcome, of their actions. If Anna was trying to widen her audience or increase her fame, then Julian became a first class mug for staying with her…she was poor company.

    ReplyDelete
  13. http://bit.ly/S5VyMI
    http://bit.ly/S5Vson

    ReplyDelete
  14. Mornin' Chuck.

    'But you can screw him now', Ardin told Borgnäs. 'He's the worst fuck ever.'

    But the article is far more interesting than that.

    I found it by following one of yer woman's tweets, I think she will be worth a follow.

    http://rixstep.com/1/1/20111121,00.shtml

    ReplyDelete
  15. Keep scrolling at the end, there are pics below.

    ReplyDelete
  16. you are a twat who should be dragged through the streets and tourtured for your terrible views

    Americano perchance? LOL

    http://onlyinamericablogging.blogspot.com/2011/03/canadian-mind-products-new-found-blog.html

    ReplyDelete
  17. Or as they say at Flashback: 'there's a screw loose in there somewhere'.

    bit.ly/soDpqi

    ReplyDelete
  18. Yep!

    I saw your torture reply.

    He's just another "greatest nation on earth" wanker.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Condom 'evidence' against Assange draws blank as no DNA link found.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCAHCmyYP1Y&feature=youtu.be

    ReplyDelete
  20. Saved condoms.

    As yo do!

    I'm gorn.

    Later xx

    ReplyDelete
  21. http://bit.ly/OEOSpI

    ReplyDelete
  22. http://bit.ly/S8NmMW
    http://bit.ly/OG46uG

    ?

    ReplyDelete
  23. http://bit.ly/S5VyMI
    no reaction

    ReplyDelete
  24. http://bit.ly/S8NmMW
    http://bit.ly/OG46uG

    She don't do irony then?

    Stroll on!

    http://www.encyclo.co.uk/define/Stroll%20On

    ReplyDelete
  25. OMG

    http://bit.ly/P2Fs3d
    http://bit.ly/QEIbAb

    Blame it on Babylon.

    By the way, I love you too M

    ReplyDelete
  26. Aren't you a sweetheart.

    Oh no! not God in the mix as well.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Lieden, a nice little story.

    http://bit.ly/S2lWHv

    Girl on a bicycle.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Thanks H, nice story.

    the moment I stepped onto a bicycle, the Dutch embraced me as one of their own

    Oh, so true.

    http://stuffdutchpeoplelike.com/2012/08/15/no-1-bicycles-bikes/

    ReplyDelete
  29. http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/patrick-cockburn-how-julian-assanges-private-life-helped-conceal-the-real-triumph-of-wikileaks-7901737.html

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anna Ardin Cubainformación. El "anticastrismo" en Suecia y trama CIA contra Julian Assange. Cuba

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QD1akIzUNH8

    ReplyDelete
  31. The "anti-Castro" in Sweden and CIA plot against Julian Assange?

    It’s about the Anna Ardin and Assange thing, linked to anti-Cuban activities of the CIA. On her blog she has a Kuba tag bit.ly/b96fIP

    http://cannonfire.blogspot.nl/2012/08/anna-ardin-and-cia.html

    In my opinion, AA is just a runaway idealist, intelligent but with a girlish world and love view. For instance, the revenge article was written due to deception by a former lover. Progressive on the one hand, conservative on the other, a strange kind of arrogance, modern day "feminists" disease. On top of that she’s a religious christian. The Bible is her dogma. There’s the angle, she will not change her mind, unable to doubt. That makes her "dangerous", a strong but unloving character, and perhaps ideal for Assange’s opponents.

    But that’s only what I think. Perhaps it all sounds weird to you, I hope you get the gist though. It is so difficult to translate philosophy thingees. Mx

    ReplyDelete
  32. I shall read this when I have come to, though it might be much later, I do have to go out sometime today.

    Much respect for your excellent analysis of AA, I don't think you are a million miles away from the truth of the matter.

    Chucky is me darlin'

    ReplyDelete
  33. Ardin worked on websites financed by USAID

    If that's true, it's about as much as you need to know.

    USAID has just been kicked out of Russia, or type usaid into the my search bar.

    ReplyDelete
  34. The Eighteenth National People's Congress of the Communist Party of China

    I know, it's incredibly exciting! Congress party is said to be cruel. Giant many small dishes

    do you think they have any food? it is not just that the losers are sent for organ donation and then it's over?

    I'm none the wiser???

    ReplyDelete
  35. http://www.skp.se/blogg/2012/10/

    ReplyDelete
  36. bit.ly/WJxVyb

    Must have a degree in Political Science.

    If in the future I will be a prominent politician

    Yeah right.

    ReplyDelete
  37. http://www.skp.se/blogg/2012/10

    Noted

    ReplyDelete
  38. http://bit.ly/TL11qr

    It's a funny old world.

    ReplyDelete
  39. In fact, I believe that she [SW] would receive universal support if she stated publicly what we already believe, that she wanted no part in this soap opera.

    http://bit.ly/WSGRgA

    I believe SW has no personal political agenda in contrast to Anna Ardin.

    ReplyDelete
  40. I shall have a look later, I'm just in the middle of doing a graphic.

    but thought I would answer while I have service, it's still playing up.

    I saved you this the other day.

    I don't have the words.

    https://twitter.com/Mobbin4Christ

    ReplyDelete
  41. God ‏
    @TheTweetOfGod

    I firmly believe the 21st century is producing some of the finest tweeters the world has ever known.

    ReplyDelete
  42. How far we’ve come.
    http://bit.ly/YQg2rQ

    ReplyDelete
  43. I was about to tweet it.

    Whooshed.

    ReplyDelete
  44. I see, whooshed.

    http://bit.ly/YKX2ht
    indirectly mocked choice of footwear

    Well, there's no taste like bad taste.

    ReplyDelete
  45. http://bit.ly/YBJqJm
    Witness for the prosecution

    ReplyDelete
  46. http://www.smh.com.au/national/assange-prosecutor-quits-while-accuser-sacks-lawyer-20130328-2gwjk.html

    ReplyDelete
  47. https://twitter.com/NOH8ER/status/312720013171777536

    ReplyDelete
  48. from whooshed twitpic to avatar
    http://bit.ly/Z8IQ61

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.