My error, I should have said your system clock is running too fast : my clock read 10:00:49 when I posted my message which registered as posted at 10:01. Having noticed the discrepancy, I said what I said about the clock.
I admire your pictures and certainly wouldn’t not tell anyone that “they” need a little more time: ‘their’ time has long since run out.
Unlike our clocks, we are synchronised in our timing, aren’t we? I am not tasty enough to bite anyway, I think, and I am not into biting.
“Translation of the Smith's e-fit: Lay off Murat or else!
And they did~!”
Are you able to tell who “they” are, what “else” implies, and who is being addressed in the imperative? If you are, please do.
Strikingly germane is the following observation (Agnos 2 March 2016 at 11:33 in New Comments and Link Dump): …“These are people that we are discussing, and not abstract concepts. It clearly necessitates a special type of care (Murat etc.)!”? Wouldn’t you agree?
I really don't want to answer for anon, but there is no reason why anybody else should consider that observation of mine as particularly germane. The context of the remark was explicitly what I accept in relation to conjecture. It was not intended to be a general "injunction." It is certainly not my intention to fix a window to every other person's soul!
Perhaps there is a distinction to make(?)
If I were to assert something as "fact" then I would hope to be right! Failing that, I would hope to be corrected.
If I express a conjecture, then whilst it might become a line worthy of discussion. It's "obligations" are mine alone.
Conjecture is richly nuanced. It touches upon irony, innuendo, satire and so forth. It an indispensable part of any discussion (and of "reason" - so I would argue). I think we each navigate as we see fit.
Anon @04:03 has made a broad conjecture from which it might be possible to infer a line of thought - as you have. Again, speaking for myself, I am happy either to accept it as such, or to leave it!
I have very little instinct for prohibition. The only obligation of "care" that I feel is towards the one thing for which I am truly responsible i.e. my own words.
Risking sounding pedantic! But I just wanted to be clear.
It is BS that has been made possible by ? I don’t know what to call it. Powered by, facilitated by?
It was bound to happen since the PJ hasn’t a clue what happened to Madeleine McCann (according to a source from the PJ), and the MPS has a much clearer picture of the events in Praia da Luz leading up to Madeleine's abduction (according to Mr and Mrs McCann).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3k5Q7QZNfFA
7:15
"Where is the child?" – Gerry McCann, father of Madeleine McCann
At the end of the day, near a dilapidated soccer stadium, a group of women starts to load bag after bag onto a double-decker bus headed back into Brazil. !!
A picture tells a thousand words…
ReplyDeleteThank you.
Your blog's clock is running too fast
ReplyDelete5 March 2016 at 10:04
ReplyDeleteGo on then, I'll bite. But whatever you do, don't tell me they just need a little more time.
Himself 10:28
ReplyDeleteMy error, I should have said your system clock is running too fast : my clock read 10:00:49 when I posted my message which registered as posted at 10:01. Having noticed the discrepancy, I said what I said about the clock.
I admire your pictures and certainly wouldn’t not tell anyone that “they” need a little more time: ‘their’ time has long since run out.
Unlike our clocks, we are synchronised in our timing, aren’t we? I am not tasty enough to bite anyway, I think, and I am not into biting.
Snowden = CIA cointel. So obvious it's painful.
ReplyDeleteAs obvious as wings on a nut?
ReplyDeleteTranslation of the Smith's e-fit: Lay off Murat or else!
ReplyDeleteAnd they did~!
Anonymous 08.03.16 @04.03
ReplyDeleteThank you for your post.
“Translation of the Smith's e-fit: Lay off Murat or else!
And they did~!”
Are you able to tell who “they” are, what “else” implies, and who is being addressed in the imperative? If you are, please do.
Strikingly germane is the following observation (Agnos 2 March 2016 at 11:33 in New Comments and Link Dump): …“These are people that we are discussing, and not abstract concepts. It clearly necessitates a special type of care (Murat etc.)!”? Wouldn’t you agree?
With utmost respect
http://www.paraguay.com/nacionales/busqueda-de-madeleine-no-es-seria-141225
ReplyDelete"Private investigator" Miraz Ullah Ali
ReplyDeletehttps://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u= http://www.abc.com.py/edicion-impresa/judiciales-y-policiales/presunto-investigador-dice-que-madeleine-esta-en-aregua-1459729.html
http://www.laprensasa.com/309_america-in-english/3674234_press-private-eye-finds-madeleine-mccann-in-paraguay.html
ReplyDeleteAnon @March 2016 at 11:32
ReplyDeleteI really don't want to answer for anon, but there is no reason why anybody else should consider that observation of mine as particularly germane. The context of the remark was explicitly what I accept in relation to conjecture. It was not intended to be a general "injunction." It is certainly not my intention to fix a window to every other person's soul!
Perhaps there is a distinction to make(?)
If I were to assert something as "fact" then I would hope to be right! Failing that, I would hope to be corrected.
If I express a conjecture, then whilst it might become a line worthy of discussion. It's "obligations" are mine alone.
Conjecture is richly nuanced. It touches upon irony, innuendo, satire and so forth. It an indispensable part of any discussion (and of "reason" - so I would argue). I think we each navigate as we see fit.
Anon @04:03 has made a broad conjecture from which it might be possible to infer a line of thought - as you have. Again, speaking for myself, I am happy either to accept it as such, or to leave it!
I have very little instinct for prohibition. The only obligation of "care" that I feel is towards the one thing for which I am truly responsible i.e. my own words.
Risking sounding pedantic! But I just wanted to be clear.
Regards again,
Agnos
Anonymous @06:23
ReplyDeletehttp://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t29035-police-debunk-claim-madeleine-mccann-was-found-in-paraguay-fox-news-latino
BS in plain language.
Martin R. @09:45
ReplyDeleteIt is BS that has been made possible by ? I don’t know what to call it. Powered by, facilitated by?
It was bound to happen since the PJ hasn’t a clue what happened to Madeleine McCann (according to a source from the PJ), and the MPS has a much clearer picture of the events in Praia da Luz leading up to Madeleine's abduction (according to Mr and Mrs McCann).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3k5Q7QZNfFA
7:15
"Where is the child?" – Gerry McCann, father of Madeleine McCann
Regards,
Maren
Maren @10:53
ReplyDeleteI know a nice little corner in S.E. Greenland where she might have gone. Easy to spot as a blonde among the natives though.
For Agnos
ReplyDeletehttp://3.bp.blogspot.com/-v8NPaC7aGXU/Vg-bKalmDyI/AAAAAAAArqY/yHbE5AC0V_A/s1600/clarence_mitchell_estate_agent%2BUnder%2BNew%2BMagement.jpg
For Martin
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_w-8JKaTohe4/TERSryaq02I/AAAAAAAAZvo/THsjYhh3Bg0/s1600/sightings.JPG
Himself,
ReplyDeleteLol...I did a quick google: bridges in Paraguay!
An emerging market? (Only 2 results!)
Cheers,
Agnos
Ag., thanks to your link. M
ReplyDeletehttp://www.latimes.com/world/brazil/la-fg-ff-brazil-smuggling-20150809-story.html
Thanks M,
ReplyDeleteAt the end of the day, near a dilapidated soccer stadium, a group of women starts to load bag after bag onto a double-decker bus headed back into Brazil. !!
Ag.