Saturday, September 20, 2014

Madeleine McCann: Hacks n' Ho's


As you may know, I have in the past, preserved for posterity, those that have either shilled for those responsible for the death of Madeleine McCann, or have got rich off the back of this tragic four year old.

Even though for the most part, I have put image making behind me, I see no reason why the latest pair of abominations to sully the memory of Madeleine McCann, scurrilous hacks, Summers and Swan, should be spared the same infamy.

The only difference of course, unlike those that have feasted on the body of the dead child previously, Summers and Swan's attempt to get rich in the same manner, has like their book, been an abject failure.

And no amount of shilling by third parties, will lift this odious piece of trash from the cesspit where it surely belongs.

I have added one or two others of the aforementioned shills and slags to this little gallery, just to remind us who they are. And it is a few, there being dozens more I could have readily added.

But to open the play, first up second up fifth up (pride of place is now given over to twenty five year career cop Jim Gamble's tweet, which, in one hundred and forty characters, manages to speak volumes. Not about the book I add, but about Gamble himself)  is the original graphic I stumbled upon, and as is said, the rest is history.



That must be why it has sold a grand total of twenty six copies on Amazon, over the past week.




Not much child protection going on here, Jimmy.







































14 comments:

  1. Good to have you back framing the idiots.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It won't leave me alone Sue, I wish the Devil it would.

    Thank you, dear girl.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What a return to form.
    Always my favourite McCann blogger. You paint a stark, minimalist landscape with the most poignant images yet make me laugh like a drain.

    The world needs more Teddies.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mamasuco

    http://twitpic.com/cyr9m3

    ReplyDelete
  5. You come across as extremely jealous of Summers and Swan. They are credible writers. Ever come close to a major literary prize Rosalinda? No indeed, because you can't 'really' write. They can. You are also wrong by stating that this book is a failure. Most people who know Summers' work, would also know that the amazon reviews of 1 star are fake. In fact, it's given the authors lots of publicity. Educated people will see through such 'reviews'. Most anti- McCann bloggers couldn't get through reading a menue in such time, let alone a book! Don't think most of them have ready anything at all, except their own blogs. Morons, mostly. Or educated, mentally ill women such as yourself and Brenda- Who really should know enough to seek real help for your obsessions, rather than using others in such a vile and grotesque manner.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ah, I'm flattered, but I do not have the considerable talents of Teddy, I merely muse and write, something I have been able to do since about the age of 4, lol.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Say whatever you like about Rosalind a, but at least she has a good soul, an extensive vocabulary and a sense of humour.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Brenda not forgotten14 October 2014 at 16:33

    'Anon' talking about S&S is clearly one of the two writers. Unfortunately, your book has tarnished any reputation you may have had. S&S have been riding on the back of their 'almost' won the Pulitzer Prize', and this Mccann book has just about ruined any credibility you may have 'almost' built up imo. So, it's pointless coming on blogs like this because nobody cares for pro-Mccann BS.

    ReplyDelete
  9. S&S were blatantly commissioned to flesh out Brunt/SKY agenda to demonize Internet #mccann-opposers as trolls.

    https://twitter.com/ProfWakeford/status/565061303715504129

    ReplyDelete
  10. https://twitter.com/1JaniceWard/status/597389369444540418

    ReplyDelete
  11. LOL

    They don't like it up 'em.

    One for you to Google.

    ReplyDelete
  12. https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/682641904199143424

    ReplyDelete
  13. https://twitter.com/JimGamble_INEQE/status/724616506068328452

    ReplyDelete
  14. I think they are both right in parts.

    If you are attracted to children, then that's who you are, that's never going to change.

    But to suggest everyone with that predisposition is a predatory paedophile is, is, is Jim Gamble through and through.

    Cherking!

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.