tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post5314982245914919150..comments2023-10-25T08:52:58.428+01:00Comments on Only In America: Trust Me, I'm a Metropolitan Police OfficerHimselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11666097098083216833noreply@blogger.comBlogger37125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-21519337104799433032016-04-18T06:56:17.720+01:002016-04-18T06:56:17.720+01:00Jane Tanner's criticism of "creche dad&qu...Jane Tanner's criticism of "creche dad" always baffled me. She's saying this man is a bad parent for failing to put socks on his kid's feet. Meanwhile, she saw this man because SHE was walking from the bar for a "check" on her own babies, who were being left alone and defenseless every night.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05788041687362586390noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-11737119116264808492016-01-27T10:40:52.822+00:002016-01-27T10:40:52.822+00:00https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/692285819512422...https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/692285819512422400<br /><br />LOL<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-82838572342983046952016-01-21T18:11:00.530+00:002016-01-21T18:11:00.530+00:00delusion or just plain old stupid
Or calculation?...<i>delusion or just plain old stupid</i><br /><br />Or calculation? She (or whoever wrote or co-wrote that book) know(s) everything that has been written about them. She cannot avoid the 'poker-face' topic, just twists it in her favour, or so she thinks, knowing her audience (the twins included). “There are over 229 videos of Madeleine on it already and that's interesting.", said Gerry McCann in August 2007. Now there’s a lot more on the internet.<br /><br />There is no mention of Cabrera (<i>one more person on the list of people to sue</i>) and Flores in her book, as far as I know.<br /><br /><i>Had these critics not seen the television pictures? Or is it that people have short and selective memories?</i><br /><br />The irony.<br /><br />Best wishes. <br /><br />Mx<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-86335695537000968732016-01-21T16:03:44.416+00:002016-01-21T16:03:44.416+00:00This comment seems to have got lost, so copied fro...This comment seems to have got lost, so copied from email.<br /><br />I particularly wanted to comment on this little gem at the end. I can't decide which epitomises the more, delusion or just plain old stupid.<br /><br /><i>By contrast, in the following weeks and months I would be subjected to cruel comments describing me as ‘cold’ and ‘poker-faced’. <b>Had these critics not seen the television pictures?</b> Or is it that people have short and selective memories?</i><br /><br />Classic!<br /><br /><br />Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Public Anguish Was a False Front": <br /><br />12.09.2007<br /><br />http://www.cmjornal.xl.pt/exclusivos/detalhe/faro-dos-caes-sinalizou-morte-perto-da-igreja.html<br /><br />"ELA CONTROLA GERRY PARA VER SE ELE AGE CORRECTAMENTE", José Cabrera Forneiro, especialista espanhol em psiquiatria forense, acredita que Kate esconde algo Disse que Kate tem cara de poker. O que significa isso? <br /><br />José Cabrera Forneiro – A expressão facial não diz tudo, mas diz algo sobre a pessoa. Significa que não manifesta o mínimo rasgo emocional, como um jogador de poker. Creio que esconde algo. <br /><br />– Está a representar? <br /><br />– Creio que sim. Desde que Maddie desapareceu mantém sempre a mesma cara séria. Sempre a olhar para o marido para ver se a actuação dele é correcta. Ela controla todas as expressões emocionais de Gerry. Ele, que aparentemente controla o casal, está a esconder algo que ela sabe e ele também já sabe.<br /><br />-------------------------<br /><br />26 October 2007<br /><br />http://www.standard.co.uk/news/be-kind-to-kate-mothers-desperate-plea-after-astonishing-attack-on-mccanns-tv-circus-act-7300346.html<br /><br />"When the time is right they will be taking action against anyone who they feel has overstepped the mark. It is good that Correio printed the name of the Spanish psychologist whose opinions they published. He is one more person on the list of people to sue." [said a friend of the McCanns]<br /><br />(...)<br /><br />Mr Cabrera was not their only critic. Portuguese criminologist Moita Flores, a former detective with the Policia Judiciaria, said: "The interview was a circus act.<br /><br />-------------------------<br /><br />http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-489889/Be-kind-Kate-Mothers-desperate-plea-astonishing-attack-McCanns-TV-circus-act.html<br /><br />http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/madeleine/393960/Madeleine-McCann-Kate-McCann-may-sue-over-claims-interview-was-staged.html<br /><br />-------------------------<br /><br />Kate McCann in 'madeleine'<br /><br />By contrast, in the following weeks and months I would be subjected to cruel comments describing me as ‘cold’ and ‘poker-faced’. Had these critics not seen the television pictures? Or is it that people have short and selective memories?<br /> Himselfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11666097098083216833noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-62720348891493832042016-01-15T07:46:00.493+00:002016-01-15T07:46:00.493+00:00rtgr 14.1 @15:15
Somehow you are right, because a...rtgr 14.1 @15:15<br /><br />Somehow you are right, because all Tapas Nine females said it was cold, quite cold, so cold and so windy. Kate even mentioned freezing in connection with a short sleeve top.<br /><br />But as you say, it was Jane Tanner that thought of the shivering child whilst being ‘abducted’ by a “not a particularly good parent”, because she could see the child's feet. <br /><br />Furthermore, we cannot even take for granted that the child Tanner saw was wearing pyjamas. There is no proof, only Tanner’s impression and the McCanns’ and their helpers’ interpretation. The child could just as well be wearing pants or leggings and a long sleeve shirt since Tanner couldn’t see the child’s arms, as far as I know.<br /><br />It stands to reason that Crèchedad’s daughter was wearing pyjamas, but Crèchedad was walking in the wrong direction and there only is a picture of those pyjamas as some kind of evidence.<br /> <br />http://i19.servimg.com/u/f19/18/18/19/63/pyjama10.jpg<br /><br />http://www.allmystery.de/i/t771edd_10f878_Pyjama-Vater-01.jpg<br /><br />It is not altogether convincing, to say the least.<br /><br />Maren<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-8103480430389655542016-01-14T15:15:56.105+00:002016-01-14T15:15:56.105+00:00Maren
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id222.html Jan...Maren<br /><br />http://www.mccannfiles.com/id222.html Jane Tanner - Record Of Tape Recorded Interview IV:<br /><br /><i>“I remember I was wearing, because it was cold, I’d got Russell’s big, I’d borrowed one of his, erm, fleeces, so I’d got a big sort of fleece, it probably came down to about here…”</i><br /> <br />Therefore it should have been St Jane not St Fiona in my 13 January 2016 at 16:07 post.<br /><br />My apologies.<br /><br />rtgrAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-82945651000045080162016-01-13T16:07:23.871+00:002016-01-13T16:07:23.871+00:00Maren 13 January 2016 at 10:21
To feign ignora...Maren 13 January 2016 at 10:21<br /><br /><br />To feign ignorance, be disingenuous, play possum come to mind in the order of preference. Martin is a walking(-the- dog) dictionary <b>:-)</b>, he would know more. Myself, I would inject ‘hurt’ (since we’ve heard so about it) into ‘feign ignorance’ and would be thrilled with ‘to feign hurt ignorance’. <br /><br />However, in the presence on this blog of those whose princely mastery of expression so often leaves me speechless, I ain’t gonna say no more. (I promise I’m not being facetious in the slightest, or Socratically ironic.)<br /><br /><br />You are Dutch then… When I first came across this blog, I thought you were Himself’s imaginary ‘White Goddess’, and only later did I realise that you could be other than she. That’s what I had in mind when I said “I’ll tell you another time” (or something similar) in one of my early posts.<br /><br />“…<i>picking up a child from a creche or coming back from dinner.</i>” <br /><br />With a child in bedtime pyjamas (coming or going)? How odd can the English be!<br /><br />What about the chill of the night? Wasn’t it St Fiona who put something on to keep herself warm? I see the argument that she foresaw being outside for a hours, whereas the child could have been expected to be in the cold for just a few minutes. But wouldn’t this argument be wrong?<br /><br />“<i>The best defence is a good offence.</i>”<br /><br />If there is such a thing as ‘best defence’, wouldn’t you rather say ‘the best defence is that which defends best’? <br /><br />I am again contemplating the 2015 judgement. It seems so far that the judge had deemed only two questions crucial and ultimately answered both in plaintiffs’ favour (+ several other observations). Do you think it would be a good idea to have a discussion of the judgement on a separate thread?<br /><br />Most grateful for your links and comments. Fab!<br /><br />Kind regards.<br /><br />Peace to all.<br /><br />rtgr<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-22552578644182610232016-01-13T10:21:00.153+00:002016-01-13T10:21:00.153+00:00Hello rtgr
Yes, that statement struck me too.
In...Hello rtgr<br /><br />Yes, that statement struck me too.<br /><br />In addition (same link)<br /><br /><i>Asked if he thought the suspect was the man who kidnapped his daughter, he said: "Potentially this could have been someone who could have been picking up a child from a creche or coming back from dinner."</i><br /><br />Here we’d call it ‘De vermoorde onschuld spelen.’ (pretending to know nothing). ‘Playing injured innocense’ in English? Does it make any sense I wonder.<br /><br />Perhaps I should say ‘The best defense is a good offense.’<br /><br />That aside, “someone coming back from dinner” might be closer to the truth.<br /><br />Maren<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-5352079847248536182016-01-13T08:58:52.172+00:002016-01-13T08:58:52.172+00:00Maren 13 January 2016 at 07:07
Morning
05 Ju...Maren 13 January 2016 at 07:07 <br /><br /><br />Morning<br /><br />05 June 2007<br />McCanns in Crimewatch appeal<br /><br />http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-459927/Madeleine-Exhausted-McCanns-Crimewatch-TV-appeal.html<br /><br />"Potentially this could have been someone who could have been picking up a child from a crèche…”<br /><br />A crèchedad… Just keeping a spare iron in the fire or having an attack of incredible foresight, Gerry?<br /><br />rgtrAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-85714122316300653852016-01-13T07:07:16.381+00:002016-01-13T07:07:16.381+00:00Martin R. 12.1 @12:05
As you say.
Relatively big...Martin R. 12.1 @12:05<br /><br />As you say.<br /><br />Relatively big.<br /><br />http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/06_01/crimewatchPA_468x345.jpg<br /><br /><br />05 June 2007<br />McCanns in Crimewatch appeal<br /><br />http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-459927/Madeleine-Exhausted-McCanns-Crimewatch-TV-appeal.html<br /><br /><i>Smiling wanly, Mrs McCann looked down at the pyjamas in her lap and added:<br /><br />"These are virtually identical, but these are little bit smaller because they are Amelie's."</i><br /><br /><br />Kate McCann in ‘madeleine’<br /><br />“We were able to show a pair of pyjamas like Madeleine’s on the programme, which was particularly important since at the time it had been incorrectly stated in some press reports that her pyjamas were white.”<br /><br /><br />May 10, 2007<br />BBC news<br /><br />http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/05/avoiding_intrusion.html<br /><br />“We passed on the accurate details of Madeleine's pyjamas, at the family's request, correcting the police's initial description”.<br /><br /><br />Who provided the initial description? Rhetorical.<br /><br />Regards<br /><br />Maren<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-41280259638072598672016-01-12T13:27:23.042+00:002016-01-12T13:27:23.042+00:00Maren 12 January 2016 at 10:11
Martin Roberts ...Maren 12 January 2016 at 10:11<br />Martin Roberts 12 January 2016 at 12:05<br /><br /><br />Thank you.<br /><br />An attempt to generalise:<br /><br />No reconciliation of contradictory indications – no abduction.<br /><br />Or more succinctly with the preceding line in mind:<br /><br /><b>No answers – no abduction!</b><br /><br />Peace.<br /><br />rtgr<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-17080720759352095552016-01-12T12:05:48.337+00:002016-01-12T12:05:48.337+00:00Maren @10:11
My namesake's 'tweet', w...Maren @10:11<br /><br />My namesake's 'tweet', which you quote, is spot on, and aligns perfectly with two respected police members (Harrison and Grime) being exiled, plus the DCI in charge of the 'impossible investigation' retiring before any conclusion is arrived at (and yet people persist in believing the government/Met. are playing with a straight bat).<br /><br />As to those pyjamas... therein we share a singular interest.<br /><br />It struck me when they were first revealed (as no doubt it did you) that a pair of abducted pyjamas couldn't be expected to return for a photo shoot! So they became Amelie's.<br /><br />However, I invite you to compare the size of the garments held aloft for the cameras with Amelie McCann's stature (she is pictured alongside her father on several occasions), bearing in mind that those clothes would have been purchased for her, as were Madeleine's (so we were told) the year before, when she was even smaller!<br /><br />Unless strapped for cash and taking advantage of an irresistible bargain, parents do not buy pyjamas to fit their children in two or three years time. Kate McCann was not that desperate. She didn't forego Madeleine's designer label items did she?<br /><br />Given the Grange remit, it is at least possible that Redwood et al have not paid attention to such details, and others that are even more damning. Or maybe that particular file is held in a tightly locked box!<br /><br />Regards<br /><br />M.R.Martin Robertsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-29444258047484033142016-01-12T10:11:14.018+00:002016-01-12T10:11:14.018+00:00http://bit.ly/1TRvS4k
And (in my opinion) to give...http://bit.ly/1TRvS4k<br /><br />And (in my opinion) to give the McCanns, their helpers and Jane Tanner an easy way out since the created ‘abductor’ and the filling in of the Eeyore-like pyjamas, based on the child’s feet, the bottom of the pyjamas with a turn-up and a pinky aspect, was not that watertight after all. Neither was the creation of Crèchedad; somewhat sloppy, but possibly a way to protect Tannerman’s and the child’s real identity.<br /><br />Fortunately, they still had Smithsman’s e-fits. <br /><br />Although they corrected Smithsman’s carrying style as witnessed by the Irish family (compared to the McCanns’ own documentary), when it comes to the crunch, Smithsman cannot be Gerry carrying Madeleine, or so we might think. The girl wasn’t wearing Eeyore’s, but white long-sleeved pyjamas, as demonstratively shown in Crimewatch. <br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZ8jmdWlB8Y<br />at 23:56 and 24:09<br /><br />“We know the pyjamas that their child was wearing”, says Mr Redwood at 22:39, referring to Crèchedad’s daughter. <br /><br />Does Mr Redwood (retired) know the pyjamas Madeleine was wearing or should I say, does he know the pyjamas she was not wearing?<br /><br />Just thoughts you know.<br /><br />Maren<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-35557475878472359552016-01-11T17:49:32.776+00:002016-01-11T17:49:32.776+00:00Trust me I'm a Met police officer/social worke...Trust me I'm a Met police officer/social worker/pol<br /><br />http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/jimmy-savile/10746412/Jimmy-Savile-sex-abuse-Islington-is-still-covering-up.html Himselfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11666097098083216833noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-40086108131526825412016-01-09T14:54:34.767+00:002016-01-09T14:54:34.767+00:006 January 2016 at 20:46
From Gerry McCann
Date 2...<br />6 January 2016 at 20:46<br /><br /><i>From Gerry McCann<br /><br />Date 22nd October 2007 8:14<br /><br />To: Bob Small<br /><br />Subject: Sketch<br /><br />Bob,</i><br /><br />Stroll on!Himselfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11666097098083216833noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-75512522135102006782016-01-09T14:47:17.108+00:002016-01-09T14:47:17.108+00:008 January 2016 at 23:53
A: Ah a whistleblower.*
...8 January 2016 at 23:53<br /><br />A: Ah a whistleblower.*<br /><br />B: It has been officially denied, ergo . . .<br /><br />C: Not police integrity again, I got bleedin' integrity coming out me ears!<br /><br />http://onlyinamericablogging.blogspot.com/search/label/Integrity<br /><br />9 January 2016 at 07:27<br /><br />Domestic extremist huh! How very Ameriki.**<br /><br />*With the recent revelation of G4s's involvement in the case, my first thought was, more potential whistleblowers, though I fancy the Met would have kept the Pinkertons in the dark when it came down to the real nitty-gritty.<br /><br />Which begs the question, what were they doing there in the first place?<br /><br />**<i>Domestic extremist</i> I fancy we all meet the criteria for that label. Though must believe what thou art told; or else! <br /> Himselfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11666097098083216833noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-49274834252282499572016-01-09T09:54:21.558+00:002016-01-09T09:54:21.558+00:00How convenient that Jane Tanner couldn’t see his f...How convenient that Jane Tanner couldn’t see his face (and Cooperman's <i>handlebar moustache</i>. M<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-79129686763876981522016-01-09T08:11:31.419+00:002016-01-09T08:11:31.419+00:00anon @8 January 2016 at 21:32
Crèchedad made a st...<br />anon @8 January 2016 at 21:32<br /><br /><i>Crèchedad made a strange visit to Mrs Cooper’s holiday villa?<br /><br />Same Kinda Clothes</i><br /><br />Surely not: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&page=1&rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3Afake%20buck%20teeth" rel="nofollow">daft link.</a><br /><br />Agnos<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-77545651143123554652016-01-09T07:27:26.013+00:002016-01-09T07:27:26.013+00:00http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/...http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/08/police-spy-thought-crime-met-jenny-jones-deomestic-extremist<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-65864857475853644552016-01-08T23:53:21.972+00:002016-01-08T23:53:21.972+00:00http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/12089...http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/12089798/Sir-Bernard-Hogan-Howe-under-fire-over-evidence-shredding-claim.html<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-18923417511657792592016-01-08T21:32:41.218+00:002016-01-08T21:32:41.218+00:00May 16, 2010
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/175...May 16, 2010<br /><br />http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/175407/Madeleine-McCann-Is-this-the-man-who-snatched-her<br /><br /><i>Snapped inadvertently in the background of a holiday photo, the mysterious man strolls along after a rain shower, staring out to sea at Praia da Luz.<br /><br />The picture was taken at the Portuguese resort days before Madeleine, then three, vanished during the evening of May 3, 2007.<br /><br />Briton Gail Cooper was having lunch with family and friends in a beachside cafe and taking photos when she saw him wandering along the beach, apparently in a world of his own.</i><br /><br />(...)<br /><br /><i>Mrs Cooper, of Newark, Nottinghamshire, said last night: “I am 98 per cent certain the man in the photo was the same man who made the strange visit to our holiday villa. His hair looks neater in the photo, but he is quite far in the background.” The picture was given to detectives in Leicestershire who are liaising with detectives in Portugal, but Mrs Cooper said she was never told whether the man had been identified.</i><br /><br /><br />Crèchedad made a strange visit to Mrs Cooper’s holiday villa?<br /><br />Same Kinda Clothes<br /><br />http://mccannfiles.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/dailymail151013a.jpg<br /><br />http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/78oct13/express-16-05-10-suspect.jpg<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-58761404344261845602016-01-08T17:22:55.317+00:002016-01-08T17:22:55.317+00:00Maren 8 January 2016 at 14:35
And thanks for ...Maren 8 January 2016 at 14:35 <br /><br /><br />And thanks for the links, Maren, love the commercials!<br /><br />Kind regards.<br /><br />rtgr<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-26981163068798080982016-01-08T14:35:48.647+00:002016-01-08T14:35:48.647+00:00Maren 8 January 2016 at 09:14
You are always a...Maren 8 January 2016 at 09:14<br /><br /><br />You are always a delight to hear from, Maren.<br /><br />I like a drink occasionally, but Heineken has never been my choice, though their line “Heineken reaches the parts other bears cannot reach” reached the heights others could not. What a line, a big favourite of mine, quite unlike “Mother and Child (Divided)” I might add.<br /><br />As to Heineken, I hold that foreign names are to be respected in writing and pronunciation as far as possible.<br /><br />I’ll drink your health today.<br /><br />Kind regards and best wishes.<br /><br />rtgr<br /><br />PS <br /><br />Having just checked my post referred to, I discovered with dismay a spelling error:<br />should be “…precious wines are not dr<b>u</b>nk but degustated…”. This I forgive myself for and I hope you and Martin also will. :-). Yes you will, yes you will, I know you will.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-32619816005843091092016-01-08T09:14:54.573+00:002016-01-08T09:14:54.573+00:00rtgr 6.1 @16:05
Neither am I (a Heineken drinker)...rtgr 6.1 @16:05<br /><br />Neither am I (a Heineken drinker), but phonetic spelling is considered to be a good sign for economical reasons (not totally off topic on second thought) as English is the world’s language.<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EjyS6PP-Ro<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKcRQzKurpI<br /><br />Kind regards,<br /><br />Maren<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-77084749072067919572016-01-06T20:46:54.070+00:002016-01-06T20:46:54.070+00:00From: Gerry McCann
Sent: 16 January 2008 13:15
To:...<i>From: Gerry McCann<br />Sent: 16 January 2008 13:15<br />To: stuart prior<br /><br />Subject: sketch<br /><br />Stuart as discussed<br /><br />Gerry</i><br /><br /><br />http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/POWERPOINT.htm<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com