tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post3020951330734611571..comments2023-10-25T08:52:58.428+01:00Comments on Only In America: Taking Stock: Dr Martin RobertsHimselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11666097098083216833noreply@blogger.comBlogger17125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-16835791426560180642015-08-30T09:12:23.049+01:002015-08-30T09:12:23.049+01:00Not hearing much from Nicola Wall are we? remember...Not hearing much from Nicola Wall are we? remember the one who claims to catch wrongdoers in the 'blink of an eye,' or before the criminal realises they've been nicked,er,um, watcha gonna do about it watcha gonna do!!! Until the McCann's and their equally dodgy cronies have been made to answer all the questions coherently, then this case will remain UNSOLVED and they say crime doesn't pay, well it has in this case. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-5023702619685928672015-03-02T09:25:35.878+00:002015-03-02T09:25:35.878+00:00All that is really needed to know about Op.Grange,...All that is really needed to know about Op.Grange, is:<br /><br />Have they interviewed the McCanns, and if so WHERE<br />(read: tea & biccies at their home)<br /><br />Have they interviewed the T7? and if so where? <br />(read: formal settings of a police station?<br /><br />Have they interviewed JW, if so and where?<br />(read: still on first name terms, call me ''Stu'' (as in Prior)<br /><br />And yes, when after near 7 years does a witness, walking in the wrong direction (see JT's Rogatory statement at the Leicester Police station) suddenly appear in another direct & at the wrong time, to become the explanation of her sighting (and years of merry-go-round dancing) of Tannerman becoming, the fully plausible ''crèche-dad''<br />Therefore placing the sighting to a later timeline & enter state left the Smithfamilies sighting.<br /><br />OH SPARE ME!!<br /><br />Just simple things....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-17026148570906212452015-02-09T20:10:43.946+00:002015-02-09T20:10:43.946+00:00I'm flattered. And like you, I only wish that ...I'm flattered. And like you, I only wish that more people would stop to think about the consequences. Not quite "watertight" is it?!!<br /><br />All the very best.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-22964029645342247292015-02-09T10:21:09.229+00:002015-02-09T10:21:09.229+00:00LOL
https://twitter.com/TeddyShepherd/status/5611...LOL<br /><br />https://twitter.com/TeddyShepherd/status/561152095282536449<br /><br /><br />https://twitter.com/TeddyShepherd/status/564718870976819200<br /><br />Himselfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11666097098083216833noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-80754362883968346302015-02-09T08:22:51.700+00:002015-02-09T08:22:51.700+00:00And in this fairyland of cunning ploys, the Met ha...And in this fairyland of cunning ploys, the Met have entitlements accorded to no other police force in the world. Rule Brittamia.<br /><br />But it's worth remembering: Amaral's investigation has stood the test of time (and god knows how many court hearings) precisely because no one has been able to demonstrate a single point of fabrication. And hence he is the thorn in their side. <br /><br />Whereas Hogan-Howe has flogged balloons?! And Redwood has interviewed Crechedad.<br /><br />(I hadn't seen the balloons. FFS.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-71997332922107977512015-02-06T11:55:25.820+00:002015-02-06T11:55:25.820+00:00Without parsing your comments, for there is no nee...Without parsing your comments, for there is no need really: the salient points.<br /><br /><i>Far from being rendered unreliable, Tanner's sighting becomes grounded in Redwoods' alternate reality show.</i><br /><br />And that is exactly what it is. Everything surrounding Creachedad, Redwood pulled it out of his arse. It is as you say, alternate reality.<br /><br /><i><br />No. This is an "investigation" fabricating evidence. Crechedad was presented to the world as evidential fact; right down to the specification of a photograph released to the global media. <b>There are boundarys, and that is one of them. Redwood crossed it.</b> More than once.</i><br /><br />And why do I highlight these things? Because there are still an awful lot of people on "our side" that have irrational faith that SY investigation is legit.<br /><br />And I despair of them, I really do. So much so in fact, if they are too vocal in support of Redwood and the Yard, they end up on my twitter blocked list. Because quite frankly, they are fucking insane.<br /><br />And this is important, because we are far less effectual as a group, when three quarters of the fuckers are away with the faeries.<br /><br />And the figure is that high, 75% of the fuckers.<br /><br /><i>If Wall is a fresh start, then three years of Redwood goes under the bus.</i><br /><br />And how likely is that? A fresh start I mean. Because it's not a case of Redwood dicking about for three years and spunking millions away. It is a case of BHH allowing all this under his watch.<br /><br />He would be nailed to a cross if such a thing were to come to pass.<br /><br />And as you are relatively new to the case, Google Bernard Hogan Howe will lead the release of balloons. He's another Jim Gamble, up to his neck in it.<br /><br />And it goes without saying, SY want a joint whatever, for the prime purpose of sinking the Portuguese side of the investigation.<br /><br />It is as corrupt as the day is long. I only wish the rest of 'em would wake up to the fact.<br /><br />Peace. Himselfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11666097098083216833noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-18527266353506310632015-02-06T09:56:51.017+00:002015-02-06T09:56:51.017+00:00Ah yes, apologies...repeated from above
23rd 13:1...Ah yes, apologies...repeated from above<br /><br />23rd 13:18<br /><br />Just fewer "fuckings"!! For the feint of heart!<br /><br />I don't know the case as well as many, and only really started reading up at the time of Leveson.<br /><br />There are times when I've had to pinch myself: is this really what I'm seeing? £10,000,000? Can it be?<br /><br />But I have never seen anything quite like this Operation Grange. Hogan-Howe's repeated requests, in public, for a joint investigation were staggering. That is not how these things are conducted. It simply isn't.<br /><br />My only conclusion: Grange has been attempting to coerce the Portuguese Judiciary into a *joint* statement of closure (probably indeterminate), which nevertheless exonerates the McCanns.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-75373694689753046572015-02-06T09:37:52.753+00:002015-02-06T09:37:52.753+00:00I'm heading out the gap shortly, will respond ...I'm heading out the gap shortly, will respond on return.<br /><br />Who are you, that you say you repeat yourself?Himselfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11666097098083216833noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-90711149674858677112015-02-06T08:22:03.357+00:002015-02-06T08:22:03.357+00:00Himself,
The problem is we're all throwing str...Himself,<br />The problem is we're all throwing straws into the wind.<br /><br />It was Amaral, in 2007, who established Tanner to be an unreliable witness. And let's be honest, it doesn't take a Sherlock Holmes to see as much; more to the point, it doesn't take a crechedad. A five minute interview would suffice - or even a cursory glance at the files! Instead of which we got crechedad and a European wide Crimewatch appeal. Redwood on Tour. Alarm bells ringing yet?<br /><br />Far from being rendered unreliable, Tanner's sighting becomes grounded in Redwoods' alternate reality show. She was indeed on that narrow street, and she did, of course, see a man carrying a child. Not only does he validate her eyesight, but her movements too. Quite a feat. But if you say so Mr Redwood.<br /><br />So to the ploy. What ploy? Pulling the rug from beneath their feet by announcing to the world (to a COURT)....Joke's on you, there was no crechedad!<br /><br />Is that really a ploy? Is such a contorted extravaganza really required to debunk that sighting?<br /><br />No. This is an "investigation" fabricating evidence. Crechedad was presented to the world as evidential fact; right down to the specification of a photograph released to the global media. There are boundarys, and that is one of them. Redwood crossed it. More than once.<br /><br />If Wall is a fresh start, then three years of Redwood goes under the bus. Operation Grange steps back, and the UK, finally, cooperates with the PJ to facilitate the return of genuine suspects into Portuguese jurisdiction.<br /><br />Pigs will fly.<br /><br />That's the only hope.<br /><br />(Sorry to repeat myself...but what more is there to do?)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-13559457945804116002015-01-23T18:44:07.399+00:002015-01-23T18:44:07.399+00:00Well said, whoever you are.Well said, whoever you are.Himselfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11666097098083216833noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-26130394370921493332015-01-23T13:20:19.162+00:002015-01-23T13:20:19.162+00:00Caaatchy....spellcheck!Caaatchy....spellcheck!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-10110483150177162422015-01-23T13:18:43.876+00:002015-01-23T13:18:43.876+00:00It's all about elimination. FFS if I hear that...It's all about elimination. FFS if I hear that once more.<br /><br />Redwood wasn't busy ruling people out. He ruled them in...and fucking left them there. The creepy guy who supposedly approached English girls. Has he been apprehended? Have charges followed? Does the PJ even acknowledge a record of the supposed attacks? Are they linked?<br /><br />To all of the above, one answer: NO.<br /><br />And yet Redwood ruled him in. If I were to defend the McCanns, I might well do the same. He has not been eliminated, not even found... Defence lawyer rubs hands in glee.<br /><br />Nobody can be eliminated until the T9 have provided a coherent, evidenced and accepted explanation for all of their movements. No one. It is the movements of the T9 that dictates the opportunity for entry and the "abduction". Hence Crimewatch. Hence the fucking debacle of Redwood's "most comprehensive reconstruction". A fabrication.<br /><br />Crèchedad: Fabrication.<br /><br />And some people still expect a trial at the Old Bailey.<br /><br />Oooaar M'Lud 'twas poetic loicense. Slowly carat hey monkey.<br /><br />The entire investigation would be ripped to fucking shreds. And nobody knows that better than Redwood.<br /><br />Is it retrievable? (Even allowing for such a will?)<br /><br />I don't see how.<br /><br />You can't slowly come around to the T9, not having "invented" a series of bogus suspects and at least one bogus witness/participant. If there is no crèchedad there is no Grange.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-67382037508836432042014-12-11T20:48:18.196+00:002014-12-11T20:48:18.196+00:00Good evening Maren, not a bad innings for the defe...Good evening Maren, not a bad innings for the defence.<br /><br />Will the decision reflect the facts though?<br /><br />Hate to be negative, but . . but you know that one sided story already.<br /><br />OT I have just watched this.<br /><br />http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b0078xjh/the-worlds-most-photographed-3-audrey-hepburn#group=p02d650f<br /><br />Quite interesting. I don't know how much you were aware of Hepburn's early life?<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audrey_Hepburn#Early_life<br /><br />Goodnight my lovely.Himselfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11666097098083216833noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-42761514791143486752014-12-11T08:11:47.707+00:002014-12-11T08:11:47.707+00:00From McCann vs Amaral trial in Lisbon 10.12.2014
...From McCann vs Amaral trial in Lisbon 10.12.2014<br /><br />http://themaddiecasefiles.com/post317292.html#p317292<br /><br />Miguel Coroadinha, representing TVI, started his allegations with a copy of today's Correio da Manhã and an article about the Faro questioning sessions, using it to make the following points:<br /><br />- the visits by SY deviate attention from the trial, repeatedly and conveniently<br /><br />- the case has already been subject to studies about its exceptional media exposure<br /><br />- the McCanns have pushed the case into the media spotlight and do everything they can to keep it there<br /><br />- the media attention has never diminished and the book had no impact on media attention or on the investigation<br /><br />- witnesses for the McCanns stated that media attention increased with the book's publication<br /><br />- TVI did not broadcast the McCanns' documentary because the couple did not want that (the channel had already negotiated the broadcast when the couple backtracked)<br /><br />- concerning the alleged damages, it is impossible to prove a causal link to the book<br /><br />- this court is not the place to discuss the investigation's mistakes (like Ricardo Afonso did), but <b>if one major mistake can be pointed out it's the mistake of not making the McCanns arguidos on the very next day after the disappearance, and if that had been done, we might not be here [in this court room] today</b><br /><br />- <b>the witnesses that were brought by the couple were too emotionally involved and too close to the couple to be credible</b><br /><br />- the two "expert" reports were used for their authors to evade any questioning about said reports<br /><br />- <b>the couple is trying to rewrite history, making everyone believe the only theory is their own, but the book is already part of the case history</b><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-78576541313920703992014-12-09T19:11:33.297+00:002014-12-09T19:11:33.297+00:00Shame shame shame. #CameronMustGo.
Thank you both ...Shame shame shame. #CameronMustGo.<br />Thank you both for this piece. I feel so disgusted to be a citizen of this country now.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-43096857223538868262014-12-09T18:24:27.349+00:002014-12-09T18:24:27.349+00:00Thank you, both.Thank you, both.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-36249850945944984222014-12-09T16:14:50.101+00:002014-12-09T16:14:50.101+00:00Excellent observation and analysis Martin, thank y...Excellent observation and analysis Martin, thank you.Himselfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11666097098083216833noreply@blogger.com