tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post2146610657917454920..comments2023-10-25T08:52:58.428+01:00Comments on Only In America: On Web AnonymityHimselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11666097098083216833noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-62359931671664729472015-11-04T13:23:24.686+00:002015-11-04T13:23:24.686+00:00http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t12119-only-in-am...http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t12119-only-in-america-latest-blog-hobs-blog-thanks-for-nothing<br /><br />How ironic since I am convinced Tania C doesn't agree with "Verdi" (lol).<br /><br /><i>Awwww, big hugs all round xx</i> <br /><br />Anonymous<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-56353972376645856942015-06-01T17:42:08.233+01:002015-06-01T17:42:08.233+01:00That's nice, and thoughtful of her.
I often t...That's nice, and thoughtful of her. <br />I often think of her myself, we had such a good rapport. Barely a day passed that we weren't in touch, bouncing stuff of each other. And as you know, she was one extraordinary researcher. Given the scope and diversity of her many blogs, one helluva researcher in fact.<br /><br />I think for memories sake, I shall do the same as yer woman.<br /><br />Thanks for all your links Maren, and please forgive my tardiness in responding at times.<br /><br />I think Martin R is on to something that might turn out to be quite profound, just lacking that vital bit of information, the key-stone as it were.<br /><br />And with that said, I must try and catch up with his emails and his thinking. Sometimes not an easy task, being the sharp bugger that he is.<br /><br />Take care dearheart.<br /><br />Hxxx<br /> Himselfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11666097098083216833noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-82195627823054451232015-05-31T20:48:30.373+01:002015-05-31T20:48:30.373+01:00http://www.gofundme.com/Legal-DefencePJGA
£20
Is...http://www.gofundme.com/Legal-DefencePJGA<br /><br /><i>£20<br /><br />Iseult S<br /><br />This is in memory of beautiful Dani (Ironside, Steel Magnolia) whom I think many people will remember. Even when she was fighting terminal cancer Dani never stopped trying to get truth and justice for Madeleine, and I know she'd have wanted to be part of this public display of support for Gonçalo Amaral. Dani, we haven't forgotten you. X</i><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-67196616393666344602015-04-04T07:19:17.256+01:002015-04-04T07:19:17.256+01:00Hi Himself,
The blogs that I`ve read (and often re...Hi Himself,<br />The blogs that I`ve read (and often returned to) from SteelMagnolia have greater substance, and <i>courage</i>, than any of our MSM hacks could ever aspire to. <br /><br />It`s when reading this Bell Pott/PRWeek stuff that I begin to realise how low our MS system has sunk. They make a virtue out of pathological dissociation. Little wonder the McCanns are still at large.<br /><br />Leveson`s keynote was "transparency". What strikes me now is that irrespective of the PRWeek claim (or any closed sessions), Mitchell ought to have been questioned as a part of the public process. It was Leveson who decided to make "The McCann Test" a central platform of his inquiry, and it was a Leveson who declared the need to "get to the bottom of their situation" (as memory serves for the exact words). <br /><br />Mitchell`s absence thus speaks volumes: Perjury would have gone off the scale; and Leveson knew it. Practically every editor, lawyer and hack must have known it too; not to mention the Leveson acolytes and "talking heads" that weigh-in to this ongoing media/web debate. <br /><br />What a circle of exploitation has spun out from that sad little apartment block.<br /><br />Agnos<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-15039518261065679652015-04-03T13:15:12.972+01:002015-04-03T13:15:12.972+01:00Good Morning.
Of Linda (Steel Magnolia) We were q...Good Morning.<br /><br />Of Linda (Steel Magnolia) We were quite close, as close as any can be via the web. We shared a lot of stuff and ideas, and though she knew she was dying and had to suffer some pretty awful therapy, she worked tirelessly in the hope of some sort of justice.<br /><br />Of the National Archive, believe it or not, I was there for the very first time today. (April 2)<br /><br />I don't know what to make of this statement:<br /><br /><i>W Communications founder Warren Johnson added: ‘The appearances of Max Clifford and Clarence Mitchell before the Leveson inquiry have highlighted the surprisingly low turn out from the rest of the PR industry.</i> <br /><br />True or false? I have no way of knowing. Mitchell doesn't appear on the witness list, but then I don't suppose he would, if he was heard in secret. But it begs the question, why should Mitchell of all people be heard in secret?<br /><br />http://bit.ly/1EQ7BYo<br /><br />The Inndy article was quite informative, thank you. Lies don't come cheap do they?<br /><br />But this little gem qualified for the gor blimey award of the day.<br /><br /><i>Lord Bell was provided with details last Friday morning of the above. He responded yesterday via his lawyers, Carter Ruck, attacking the Bureau. Lord Bell said: "The conduct of the Bureau of Investigative Journalism does not remotely constitute responsible journalism. <b>It is an attempt by unethical, deception to manufacture a story where none exists."</b></i><br /><br />What's the saying, you couldn't make it up? And then some.<br /><br />I will be tweeting said gem, in the form of a jpg, later on.<br /><br />And it wasn't just Gerry McCann that perjured himself before Leveson, his missus too, as observed by Martin R. And this some good few years past.<br /><br /><i>From 'The Exception Tests the Rule (9.12.11)<br /> <br />"In telling Lord Justice Leveson et al that 'there were no body fluids' discovered in the wheel well of their hire car subsequent to Madeleine's disappearance, Kate McCann was not calling into question the attribution of any DNA sample derived from scrutiny of the vehicle in question, but whether such a sample had existed at all. Now, the likelihood of a senior man at the FSS describing in some detail to Leicestershire Police the results of an analysis conducted on a non-existent sample is remote in the extreme. And since a copy of that correspondence is present in the same files Kate McCann had earlier claimed to have studied in some depth, it makes her dogmatic declaration all the more bizarre."</i> http://www.mccannfiles.com/id356.html<br /><br />Which, if you will excuse me, I am about to go and read in full.<br /><br /><br />Himselfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11666097098083216833noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-76534156207158005072015-04-02T18:28:47.437+01:002015-04-02T18:28:47.437+01:00If the true story of this revolting McCann saga ev...If the true story of this revolting McCann saga ever gets written then that graphic deserves several chapters to itself; dedicated to all those members of our "liberal" democracy, and our "liberal" media, who of course knew nothing.<br /><br />BTW it was @SteelMagnolia who first got me reading about all of this. My brief stint on Twitter being at the time of Leveson.<br /><br />You probably know this stuff better than me, but some links re Leveson, Mitchell...and yep, Bell Pottinger.<br /><br />To my knowledge <i>all</i> Leveson participants were under oath. FAQ etc here:<br /><br />http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/faqs/<br /><br />Interestingly PRWeek states that Mitchell gave evidence to the inquiry:<br /><br />http://www.prweek.com/article/1116614/clarence-mitchell-speaks-following-leveson-inquiry<br /><br /><i>If</i> this was the case then his evidence was heard in private session. Why would that be?<br /><br />For good measure, the Independent article mentioned in the above:<br /><br />http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/caught-on-camera-top-lobbyists-boasting-how-they-influence-the-pm-6272760.html<br /><br />Bell Pottinger boast of their ability to influence the PM. Now there`s a thing. <br /><br />Yes, it`s all old stuff, but these little glimpses keep affording connections don`t they?<br /><br />Agnos<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-56052694638189221742015-04-02T12:41:32.734+01:002015-04-02T12:41:32.734+01:00Legislation as a rule. Because if you have done . ...Legislation as a rule. Because if you have done . . . .<br />http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-mmElJ_SjK00/VR0pN-PkSeI/AAAAAAAArP0/J_CqBfwtIWU/s1600/City%2Bof%2BLondon%2BPolice.jpgHimselfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11666097098083216833noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8393578624305189946.post-12346941128649022782015-04-01T19:02:12.860+01:002015-04-01T19:02:12.860+01:00When they resort to asking and who are you?, then ...When they resort to asking <i>and who are you?</i>, then you know they`re thinking <i>and what might be done with you, to stop you speaking</i>.<br /><br />Agnos<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com